1 877-431-4276

Proof God is Real

Will You Dare to Follow Christ?

Joshua 24:15 “Choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve…But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.”

As a child, I read Choose Your Own Adventure books. If you read them too, you will remember that, at crucial points in the story, the books gave the reader a choice concerning how the hero or heroine will respond. How you choose sends them off on one adventure or another. The same is true in your spiritual walk. God has designed your story so that you have the opportunity to choose your own adventure. 

In Deuteronomy 30:19 God explains the choice this way, “I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing; therefore choose life.” So, after reading this far, it’s up to you as the reader to make a decision. Is God real? Is the Bible true? Is Jesus the Son of God?  Do you believe the message of the Bible? Or do you choose not to believe? You get to choose the direction your story takes. But be careful: this decision is bigger than a simple life and death issue (if that could be called simple). Your decision is a question of eternal life and eternal death.

Will you choose the way of life that leads to heaven, or will you choose to walk away from God and eventually end up in hell? 

One of my atheist friends asked me, “How do I choose to believe if I do not believe? The reason I do not believe is not because I don’t want to believe, it is because I can’t believe.” I answered him by saying, “If you feel you cannot believe, ask the God you do not believe in to give you the faith to believe. If you ask, I am confident He will reveal Himself to you.”   Jesus once said to a man, “If you can believe, all things are possible to him who believes.” The man responded, “Lord, I believe; help my unbelief” (Mark 9:24). This man acknowledged that at the same time that he believed, he was also struggling with unbelief. Doubt and problems with belief are not insurmountable problems to God. The key is to not allow your lack of belief or faith to keep you from going to God.

There is a proverb that says “Lean not on your own understanding: In all your ways, acknowledge [God], and He shall direct your paths” (Proverbs 3:5-6). This means that when we are struggling with unbelief, we have two choices: we can trust our doubts, or we can take that unbelief to God—acknowledging it to Him. If we choose to trust in our unbelief, we will never start believing. But if we take our unbelief to God, He can show us the way to Him. 

If you have doubts, or are having difficulty believing, God is on your side. He is not against those who do not believe. As it says in John 3:17: “God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through him might be saved.” The only question that remains is: Will you dare to follow Christ? 

Get your copy of Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3kIEOyA 

Buy a Study Guide for Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3ozDlfq 

Enroll in the Proof God is Real School of Apologetics: https://www.danielkingministries.com/proof 

About the Author:  Dr. Daniel King is a missionary evangelist who has traveled to over seventy nations in his quest for souls. His goal is to lead 1,000,000 people to Jesus every year through massive Gospel Festivals, distribution of literature, and leadership training. Because of his experience and research on evangelism, he is widely regarded as one of the world’s leading experts in mass evangelism. As an evangelist, he has a deep interest in using apologetics to convince skeptics that God is real.

Is Science the Ultimate Source of Truth?

Medieval theologian Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) described theology as “the queen of the sciences.” In his day, all scientific study was subordinated to the theologian’s higher research into the nature of God. The temporal natural world was of a lower order than the eternal and supernatural. Theology was queen because it sought to discover ultimate truth. 

But today, theology has been dethroned, and there is a consensus among scientists that science and theology should not mix. For the “new atheists” the reason they should not mix is that the two are directly opposed. Sam Harris writes, “The conflict between religion and science is unavoidable. The success of science often comes at the expense of religious dogma; the maintenance of religious dogma always comes at the expense of science.” Christopher Hitchens wrote, “All attempts to reconcile faith with science and reason are consigned to failure and ridicule.” Richard Dawkins said, “I am hostile to fundamentalist religion because it actively debauches the scientific enterprise […] It subverts science and saps the intellect.” Atheists generally look to science as the source of ultimate truth.

The conflict between science and religion is due to a misunderstanding of the realms they explore and roles they play. Some atheists believe religion is mainly an attempt to explain the unexplainable in nature. From this they argue that the more science explains, the less there is for religion to explain. For example, some atheists believe religion was originally invented by cavemen to explain thunder and lightning. Now that science has discovered the natural explanations for these natural phenomena, religion has one less thing to explain. But such perspective only acknowledges a natural world that can be scientifically observed. If human knowledge was limited to what was observable scientifically, then the atheists could be correct. But, theology and its cousin philosophy remain important because human experience and knowledge is larger than science. Science can answer questions about how, but only philosophy and theology can answer the questions of why.

Science is good at answering the “how” questions. The scientific method forms a hypothesis and then tests the hypothesis through experimentation. The results of the experiment are analyzed. If the evidence shows the hypothesis is falsifiable, then a new hypothesis must be formed and tested. The near religious belief in science and its methods that many atheists and others hold is called scientism or logical positivism.  This perspective claims that if something cannot be proved in the laboratory, it should not be believed. The problem with such thinking is that it fails to acknowledge the limitations of science for covering areas of knowledge that cannot be scientifically examined—such as history, ethics, aesthetics, philosophy, and religious experience. 

For example, it is impossible to do experiments in the laboratory to prove historical events. Using science, one cannot prove that George Washington was the first president of the United States or that Ronald Reagan was the 40th. One cannot prove that Julius Caesar or Shakespeare ever lived. One cannot prove scientifically that Jesus rose from the dead. The facts of His existence or His resurrection are not a repeatable experiment. 

There are many things that humans know that can never be scientifically tested. Science can measure the saliva transfer that happens during a kiss, but not the love of two individuals. Science can predict the exact time of the sunset, but it cannot explain why it is beautiful. Science can unwrap the DNA helix, but it cannot tell us why we are here on this earth. Science can discover ever more effective ways for us to kill people, but science has no ability to tell us why we should not kill. Science is good at answering the question of how, but it often doesn’t have an answer for why.

Answering the question of why is the role of religion. Galileo (1564-1642), the scientist, astronomer, and theologian wrote: “The Bible shows the way to go to heaven, not the way the heavens go.” Isaac Newton, the scientist and mathematician, said, “Gravity explains the motions of the planets, but it cannot explain who set the planets in motion.” Science can explain natural things, but it cannot explain the supernatural. It can explain the observable, but not what is unseen. It can explain the human body, but it cannot perform experiments on the human spirit. For this reason, science has not disproven miracles. In fact, it is impossible for science to disprove miracles. Science deals exclusively with the natural world and does not acknowledge a supernatural world. A miracle, by definition, is something that does not happen naturally. Because human experience is larger than science, science cannot be the source of ultimate truth. Believing that science has the answers to all life’s questions may seem comforting, but as Carl Sagan, an atheist and scientist said, “It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is then to persist in delusion however satisfying or reassuring.” To insist that science is the source of ultimate truth is to persist in a delusion.

Ultimately, there should be no conflict between theology and science. Both are concerned with seeking truth. Albert Einstein said, “A legitimate conflict between science and religion cannot exist. Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.” Certainly, science has been a great blessing to society. Because of scientific progress the world enjoys electricity, motorized transport, and cell phones. Science has cured tuberculosis, given us vaccines, and extended our life spans. But for all the good things that science has achieved, it has also enabled great evil. From gunpowder, to land mines, to atomic bombs, to unmanned drones, science has continually invented more efficient ways of killing other humans. Crimes, like identity theft and many forms of fraud are enabled by the technologies created from science. Science doesn’t have the power to set the world free from evil. Truth, not science, is the remedy for error. 

Get your copy of Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3kIEOyA 

Buy a Study Guide for Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3ozDlfq 

Enroll in the Proof God is Real School of Apologetics: https://www.danielkingministries.com/proof 

About the Author:  Dr. Daniel King is a missionary evangelist who has traveled to over seventy nations in his quest for souls. His goal is to lead 1,000,000 people to Jesus every year through massive Gospel Festivals, distribution of literature, and leadership training. Because of his experience and research on evangelism, he is widely regarded as one of the world’s leading experts in mass evangelism. As an evangelist, he has a deep interest in using apologetics to convince skeptics that God is real.

Was Jesus a Liar, a Lunatic, or Lord?

Premise A: Jesus claimed to be God

Premise B: Jesus is either a liar, a lunatic, or He is what He claimed to be: God 

Premise C: Jesus is not a liar or a lunatic 

Conclusion: Therefore, Jesus is God 

Jesus is either bad, mad, or God. C.S. Lewis, in Mere Christianity, proposes the liar, lunatic, or Lord trilemma. Lewis wrote: “You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse. You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill him as a demon or you can fall at his feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about His being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to.” 

Was Jesus a Liar? Jesus claimed to be God and even acted like He was God. Is it possible that Jesus made up the story about being God in order to gain attention, power, or money? If it was for any of these reasons, He must have been disappointed in the result. From all we know, while He was not a poor beggar, He was not wealthy. While He was popular for a short time, He was crucified with hardly anyone to mourn his death. The attention that His claims got Him eventually led to His execution. If He had simply renounced His claims of divinity, He would never have been crucified. Most people who are lying stop the dishonesty when their life hangs in the balance.  For centuries, even those who are not Christians have recognized the beauty and power of Jesus’ teaching. Gandhi, the father of modern India, said, “To me, [Jesus] was one of the greatest teachers humanity has ever had.” It would be a strange ethical teacher who built his reputation on a foundation of lies. Jesus cannot be both a chronic liar and a great moral teacher. 

Was Jesus a Lunatic? Admittedly, some of the things Jesus said sound a little crazy. There are crazy people in the world and sometimes they say similarly crazy things. Perhaps you’ve heard the joke about the two inmates in the psychiatric hospital: Once there was a man in a lunatic asylum who claimed to be Moses reincarnated. The psychologist came into his cell and asked him, “Why do you think you are Moses?” The man explained, “I know I’m Moses incarnated because that’s what God said.” From the next cell came the voice of another inmate who said, “I never said that.”   A sane person knows he or she is not creator of the universe, but Jesus claimed to be exactly that.

Evidence against him being crazy rests in the miracles that Jesus performed. A lunatic may claim to be able to heal the sick, but Jesus actually healed the sick. A lunatic might claim to be able to rise from the dead, but only true divinity can come back from the grave.  As his moral teaching prove that Jesus is no liar, they also prove that He was not insane.

Thomas Jefferson, the author of the Declaration of Independence and the third president of the United States, was a deist who accepted Christ’s moral teaching but rejected his miracles. Jefferson used scissors to cut all the supernatural accounts out of the Gospels, but he kept all the teachings of Jesus. Yes, Jesus was a great teacher, but if his teachings are taken seriously, his claims of divinity seriously must be taken just as seriously. Jesus cannot be both a great moral teacher and a lunatic.

Jesus is Lord. The trilemma is solved. Jesus is not a liar. Jesus is not crazy. The only option left of the three is that He is Lord. He is who He claimed to be: the Creator of the Universe, the Son of God. The ultimate proof that Jesus is who He claimed to be is the fact that He rose from the dead. The fact that Jesus claimed to be God and actually provided proof that He is God by rising from the dead once again shows me that: God CARES! 

Get your copy of Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3kIEOyA 

Buy a Study Guide for Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3ozDlfq 

Enroll in the Proof God is Real School of Apologetics: https://www.danielkingministries.com/proof 

About the Author:  Dr. Daniel King is a missionary evangelist who has traveled to over seventy nations in his quest for souls. His goal is to lead 1,000,000 people to Jesus every year through massive Gospel Festivals, distribution of literature, and leadership training. Because of his experience and research on evangelism, he is widely regarded as one of the world’s leading experts in mass evangelism. As an evangelist, he has a deep interest in using apologetics to convince skeptics that God is real.

Did Jesus Really Exist?

Premise A: If Jesus existed, there would be historical records to support this.

Premise B: The Gospels and other historical records of Jesus life exist.

Conclusion: Therefore, Jesus existed. 

Was Jesus a real person? Did He really live in Israel approximately two thousand years ago? How do we know what Jesus really said and did? Lee Strobel was an investigative journalist before he became a Christian. Instead of looking for scientific proof of God’s existence, he decided to approach the question of Jesus’ existence the same way an investigative journalist approaches as news story. His search was for legal proof that could establish a case “beyond a reasonable doubt.” In The Case for Christ he interviews top scholars concerning historical proof for the claims of Christ. 

Lee Strobel asks, “How do we know anything about the past?” How do we know that George Washington crossed the Delaware, or that Plato really lived? None of us were alive back then. Our knowledge of history must rely upon historical reports. In the case of Washington and Plato, we rely on writings that tell us about their lives. Even though we never saw them ourselves, we can judge the reliability of eyewitness reports about them. Scholars believe Washington existed because they believe the reports that were written about his life. 

In the case of Jesus, we have four different reports that have been written about His life by people who were eyewitnesses or who interviewed eyewitnesses about his life. These four reports are known as the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. In addition to the Gospels, there are a variety of other historical reports that prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Jesus really existed. Let’s look at some of the evidence. 

The Epistles prove that Jesus existed 

The Apostle Paul wrote the Epistle to the Galatians in approximately 50 A.D. In this book, written twenty years after Jesus ascended to heaven, he confirms that Jesus lived, died, and rose again. In his first letter to the Corinthians believers, Paul states:

For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, and that He was seen by Cephas, then by the twelve. After that He was seen by over five hundred brethren at once, of whom the greater part remain to the present, but some have fallen asleep. After that He was seen by James, then by all the apostles. Then last of all He was seen by me also, as by one born out of due time” (1 Corinthians 15:3-8). 

When Paul says that the 500 people who saw Jesus after the resurrection were still alive, he means that they can be called on to corroborate his testimony. The Galatians, 1 Corinthians, and other New Testament epistles give evidence of a community of Christians who believed in the physical resurrection of Jesus Christ during the mid-first century. 

The four Gospels prove Jesus existed 

Gospel simply means good news, and that’s what the four Gospels give us—the good news about Jesus the Son of God and Savior of mankind. Matthew, Mark, and Luke are known as the synoptic Gospels because they contain much of the same material. This material (known by scholars as the Q material), may have come directly from the pen of someone who wrote down Jesus’ words as he spoke them. Perhaps Matthew, a well-educated tax collector, kept a notebook of Jesus’ sayings. The Gospel of John was written by “the disciple whom Jesus loved.” John personally walked and talked with Jesus. He saw the miracles he records with his own eyes. 

Each of the Gospel writers provides a valuable and slightly different perspective. Matthew writes to a Jewish audience, Mark writes to people living in Rome, Luke writes his Gospel to the Gentiles, and John writes to the Church. Because they are writing to different audiences, the Gospel writers emphasize different aspects of the ministry of Jesus. Matthew focuses on Jesus as the long-awaited king, Mark presents Jesus as a suffering servant, Luke emphasizes the humanity of Jesus, and John reveals the divinity of Jesus. 

Much ado has been made about so-called “inconsistencies” between the different Gospel accounts. But, the differences in the stories of the Gospel writers are not a weakness; instead they are strengths. Each of the Gospel writers had a different perspective, just as different witnesses at a car wreck remember different details of what they witnessed. David Limbaugh writes, “These variations are not contradictions. In fact, they add weight to the authenticity of the writings, since if the writers aimed to produce fully synchronized narratives, they could have colluded to vet any discrepancies.” 

Some have argued that one cannot accept the Gospels as evidence for the life of Jesus because they were written by Christians—the idea being that only non-Christians could be trusted to tell the objective truth about Jesus. But this line of argument is like only trusting books on BBQ that are written by vegans. Often the best proof can be found in the writings of those who have been most impacted by an event. After carefully examining the evidence of the four accounts about the life of Jesus, it can be said with great certainty that Jesus really lived, preached, performed miracles, died, and rose from the dead. 

Non-Christian writers prove that Jesus existed 

Evidence for the life of Jesus is not just found in the Gospels. He is mentioned by a variety of non-Christian writers in the years following his death. 

1. Josephus, a first century Jewish historian, mentions Jesus twice in his Antiquities of the Jews. The first time he mentions Christ is when he writes about the condemnation of James “the brother of Jesus the so-called Christ.”Later he writes:

At this time there was a wise man who was called Jesus. And his conduct was good and he was known to be virtuous. And many people from among the Jews and from the other nations became his disciples. Pilate condemned him to be crucified and to die. And those who became his disciples did not abandon his discipleship. They reported that he had appeared to them three days after his crucifixion and that he was alive.  

Some scholars think part of this statement might be an interpolation by a later Christian editor, but the fact that a Jewish historian mentions Jesus at all is significant. 

2. Pliny the Younger wrote to Emperor Trajan around A.D. 112 seeking advice concerning the prosecution of Christians in the court of law. Concerning Christians, he writes, 

They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food—but food of an ordinary and innocent kind. 

3. The Roman historian Tacitus, writing in 115 A.D about the fire that destroyed Rome in A.D. 64, records:

Nero fastened the guilt […] on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our Procurators Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome. 

4. In 115 A.D. Suetonius wrote about Claudius who was emperor from 41-54. He mentions how a group of Jews were deported from Rome during his reign after disturbances “on the instigation of Chrestus.” It is likely that he misspelled Christus. If so, this reference puts Christians living in Rome in the 50’s A.D.  

4. The Babylonian Talmud mentions Jesus in a negative light. In writings dated to A.D. 70-200, they say, “On the eve of the Passover Yeshu was hanged. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald […] cried, ‘He is going forth to be stoned because he has practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy’.”

5. Lucian of Samosata, a second century Greek satirist, wrote about the Christians, 

The Christians […] worship a man to this day—the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account […]. [It] was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws.

Yes, Jesus was there

The enormous number of written accounts of Jesus’ existence written just a few decades after his life provide overwhelming evidence He really existed. Few historians question the existence of Hannibal, the rebel general during the Second Punic War, yet the earliest account we have of him was written by Polybius about one hundred years after the war was over. Most of we know about Hannibal comes from another historian, Livy, writing more than two hundred years after the fact.  The evidence for the life of Buddha in the Pāli Canon was written down about five hundred years after he was alive. But no one disputes the existence of Buddha or the main events of his life. Compared to the historical record supporting Hannibal and Buddha, the written evidence for the existence of Jesus and the events of His life could be considered “hot-off-the-press.” Based on this evidence, it is certain that Jesus was a real person.

Get your copy of Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3kIEOyA 

Buy a Study Guide for Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3ozDlfq 

Enroll in the Proof God is Real School of Apologetics: https://www.danielkingministries.com/proof 

About the Author:  Dr. Daniel King is a missionary evangelist who has traveled to over seventy nations in his quest for souls. His goal is to lead 1,000,000 people to Jesus every year through massive Gospel Festivals, distribution of literature, and leadership training. Because of his experience and research on evangelism, he is widely regarded as one of the world’s leading experts in mass evangelism. As an evangelist, he has a deep interest in using apologetics to convince skeptics that God is real.

What is the Problem with Evolution?

What is simpler: Creation or Evolution? 

Premise A: Something cannot come from nothing. 

Premise B: There is something.

Premise C: These somethings are systematic, complex, and finely tuned.

Conclusion: Therefore, there must have been Something capable of designing the complex systems apparent in the universe and biological life. This Something we call God 

According to the principle called Occam’s Razor, the simplest explanation is probably the right one. So, which explanation is simpler? 

  • • The non-living universe appeared from nothing. From this non-living material life spontaneously arose. This life then mutated billions (if not trillions) of times over millions of years to finally produce…apes. Or,
  • • A Creator carefully designed and brought the universe, life, and humanity into existence.

Extraordinary circumstances require extraordinary explanations. Minute random changes spread over millions of years cannot explain our existence. Science simply cannot explain the origin of life, the origin of biological complexity, or the origin of personal consciousness. If I start with nothing, that nothing will still be nothing whether I wait one year or a million years. The addition of millions of years of time does not solve the fundamental impossibility of design appearing from nothing. Take a piece of iron ore. Lay it on your desk. How many millions of years will you wait before the ore spontaneously forms itself into the intricate springs and levers that enable a watch to accurately tell time? A tiny bird is far more precise and complicated than a 747 airplane. The bird has millions of interlocking cells and processes that work together to keep the bird in flight. It is absurd to imagine that a plane put itself together. But without batting an irreducibly complex eye, the evolutionist says, “Birds appeared over millions of years of evolution.” 

The evidence from design is increasing. The more we know about the universe, the more we know about the complexity of biological life, and the more apparent it is that we and our world have been carefully designed. Only someone intent on denying the existence of a Creator believes that the staggering symmetry of the universe is a random occurrence or that the intricate design of the human body could drag itself up from the primordial mud.

From the enormous cosmos to the microscopic cell, one thing is obvious: God is THERE! 

Get your copy of Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3kIEOyA 

Buy a Study Guide for Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3ozDlfq 

Enroll in the Proof God is Real School of Apologetics: https://www.danielkingministries.com/proof 

About the Author:  Dr. Daniel King is a missionary evangelist who has traveled to over seventy nations in his quest for souls. His goal is to lead 1,000,000 people to Jesus every year through massive Gospel Festivals, distribution of literature, and leadership training. Because of his experience and research on evangelism, he is widely regarded as one of the world’s leading experts in mass evangelism. As an evangelist, he has a deep interest in using apologetics to convince skeptics that God is real.

Bacteria Proves that God Exists

In Darwin’s Black Box, Michael Behe, a professor of biochemistry at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania, proposed bacterial flagellum as examples of irreducible complexity. This complexity of bacterial flagellum works like a spring-loaded mouse trap. A mouse trap consists of a rectangular board, a trigger, a spring, and a bar. When the mouse moves the bait, the bait jogs the trigger, the trigger releases the spring, and the spring causes the bar to snap down on the mouse’s neck. If any one of these pieces are removed from the mouse trap, the entire trap would be rendered useless, and the mouse would run off with the cheese. 

In a similar manner, Behe argued, the protein assemblies of a bacterial flagellum are irreducibly complex. The bacterial flagellum is a lash-like appendage that extends from the body of certain bacteria cells. This appendage allows the cell to achieve locomotion. The flagellum consists of multiple parts including the stator, rotor, shaft, bushing, a hook, and a whip. If any one of these parts is removed, the flagellum would no longer work. It is, therefore, impossible for the flagellum to slowly evolve, part by part since no part of the bacterial flagellum could have appeared independently. Such is Behe’s argument.

The complexity of so minute a system as bacterial flagellum is truly marvelous. Because of this flagellum, some bacteria cells can achieve amazing speeds in proportion to their size. Some can go as fast as 60 cell lengths per second. In comparison, the fastest land animal, a cheetah can go about 25 body lengths per second. The design of the bacterial flagellum is proof that there is a Designer. 

Get your copy of Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3kIEOyA 

Buy a Study Guide for Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3ozDlfq 

Enroll in the Proof God is Real School of Apologetics: https://www.danielkingministries.com/proof 

About the Author:  Dr. Daniel King is a missionary evangelist who has traveled to over seventy nations in his quest for souls. His goal is to lead 1,000,000 people to Jesus every year through massive Gospel Festivals, distribution of literature, and leadership training. Because of his experience and research on evangelism, he is widely regarded as one of the world’s leading experts in mass evangelism. As an evangelist, he has a deep interest in using apologetics to convince skeptics that God is real.

The Human Eye Proves God Exists

The eye is amazingly complex with many interworking parts. There are three layers of tissue in the eye. The outer layer is called the sclera. This layer gives the eyeball its white color. The middle layer is the choroid. It contains blood vessels that supply oxygen to the retina. The retina is the innermost layer. In the front of the eye is the cornea, a transparent structure that helps to focus incoming light. The iris is a colored ring-shaped membrane found behind the cornea. In the middle of the iris is a circular opening called the pupil that expands and contracts depending on how much light enters the eye. A clear fluid known as the aqueous humor fills the area between the cornea and the iris. Behind the pupil is clear structure called the crystalline lens. This lens is surrounded by ciliary muscles that hold it in place and that also assist in helping us see. To see objects far away, the muscles relax, pulling on the lens and flattening it. To see objects close at hand, the muscles contract, causing the lens to thicken. Inside the eyeball is found a jelly-like tissue called the vitreous humor. After light travels through the lens, the light travels through this tissue before hitting the retina. Embedded in the retina are millions of light sensitive cells that are divided into rods and cones. The rods help us see monochrome vision in low light conditions; the cones help us see colors and fine detail. When light hits the rods and cones, the light is converted into an electrical impulse that is carried to the brain through the optic nerve. The brain translates the electric impulse into an image. This cleverly designed and complex process gives us sight. 

The eye is far more sophisticated than a camera, yet no one ever thinks that a camera came into existence by chance. But not only does the evolutionary narrative insist that eyes are the result of chance, but it insists still further that this staggeringly complex organ randomly developed not just in one species, but in many species at the same time. The odds are astronomical. The fact that I can see anything at all, makes me say, “Yes, God is there!”

Get your copy of Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3kIEOyA 

Buy a Study Guide for Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3ozDlfq 

Enroll in the Proof God is Real School of Apologetics: https://www.danielkingministries.com/proof 

About the Author:  Dr. Daniel King is a missionary evangelist who has traveled to over seventy nations in his quest for souls. His goal is to lead 1,000,000 people to Jesus every year through massive Gospel Festivals, distribution of literature, and leadership training. Because of his experience and research on evangelism, he is widely regarded as one of the world’s leading experts in mass evangelism. As an evangelist, he has a deep interest in using apologetics to convince skeptics that God is real.

What is a Christian World View?

What does the world look like to a Christian?

Here are my assumptions, my presuppositions, (the lenses through which I see the world, if you will):  

1. I believe there is a God. This first great assumption comes from my observations of nature and myself. Because there is order in the universe, something must have given this universe order. Design requires a designer. Inside me there is a sense of right and wrong that comes from a moral lawgiver. Morality requires a moral law giver. These two reasons, more than any others, convince me there is a God. 

2. I believe the God who is There has revealed Himself through the Bible. The starting point of Christian apologetics is the Bible. But, what makes the Bible unique? There are many different religions with many different holy books. Why believe the Bible is the one true book? To leap from the belief that there is a God to the belief that this God who created us is the One seen in the Bible requires faith. But, there are many rational reasons for taking this step of faith.  The evidence for the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus sustains my faith that the Bible is true. 

3. I believe, based on the Bible, that God created me with a purpose. Not only is God There, He also is a God that Cares. He did not simply create, He also sticks around and is intimately concerned with what is happening in the world today and cares individually for what is going on in my life. The first man was originally created in the image of God in order to have fellowship with God, but because of sin (disobedience to God’s commands), this fellowship was broken. 

4. I believe, based on the Bible, that it is possible for me to have a relationship with God. Since God cares about me, He wants to have a relationship with me. This relationship is not only possible, it is also a relationship that I experience on a daily basis. 

5. I believe, based on the Bible, that this relationship with God begins when I make Jesus Christ the Lord of my life. The Bible says, “Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved” (Acts 2:21). The day I cried out to Jesus was the day that my relationship with God began. I chose to trust in Christ in response to the drawing of the Holy Spirit. 

6. I believe, based on the Bible, that humanity is sinful and that Jesus provided for the salvation of humankind through His death on a cross and resurrection from the dead. The sin of humankind is obvious. People lie, cheat, steal, and have hate in their heart for their brothers. G.K Chesterton expressed the idea that original sin is the only church doctrine that can be empirically verified. The Bible says, “All have sinned” (Romans 3:23). The Bible also says, “…the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord” (Romans 6:23). 

7. I believe, based on Jesus’ instructions in the Bible, that it is my responsibility to tell humanity about the salvation that is available to all who call on Jesus for salvation. This seventh belief is the reason why I am writing this book. I want you to put your faith in God and to start living for Him. Your life will be better if you decide to believe in God and to trust Jesus Christ for your salvation. 

Get your copy of Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3kIEOyA 

Buy a Study Guide for Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3ozDlfq 

Enroll in the Proof God is Real School of Apologetics: https://www.danielkingministries.com/proof 

About the Author:  Dr. Daniel King is a missionary evangelist who has traveled to over seventy nations in his quest for souls. His goal is to lead 1,000,000 people to Jesus every year through massive Gospel Festivals, distribution of literature, and leadership training. Because of his experience and research on evangelism, he is widely regarded as one of the world’s leading experts in mass evangelism. As an evangelist, he has a deep interest in using apologetics to convince skeptics that God is real.

What is Apologetics?

The word apologetics comes from the Greek word apologia, meaning “to give a reasoned response,” and it is used seven times in the New Testament (Acts 22:1, 25:16; 1 Cor. 9:3; Phil. 1:7,16; 2 Tim. 4:16; 1 Pet. 3:15). The purpose of Christian apologetics is to rationally examine the beliefs of Christianity in order to give a reason for the hope that is in us (1 Peter 3:15). Apologists defend the faith and combat unbelief.

It is Biblical to use reason to encourage ourselves in our own faith and to persuade other people concerning the truth of God’s Word. The prophet Isaiah wrote, “Come now, and let us reason together…” (Isaiah 1:18). The Apostle Paul “went into the synagogue and spoke boldly for three months, reasoning and persuading concerning the things of the kingdom of God” (Acts 19:8). Believers are called to love God with all their hearts, minds, souls, and bodies (Luke 10:27). In a sense, apologetics is how we love God with our minds. 

Since it provides a logical foundation for the Christian faith, apologetics is part of a strong theology. Before we can explain sin and salvation, atonement and the sacraments, reprobation and redemption; we must be able to discuss and defend God’s creation of the universe and the historical fact of Christ’s resurrection. If God did not create the universe, then Adam and Eve are mythical people and there is no such thing as “sin.” If Jesus did not rise physically from the dead, then there is no salvation and no eternal life with him after death. So, the material covered in this series of blog posts should be a primary concern of Christian education. 

Get your copy of Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3kIEOyA 

Buy a Study Guide for Proof God is Real: https://amzn.to/3ozDlfq 

Enroll in the Proof God is Real School of Apologetics: https://www.danielkingministries.com/proof 

About the Author:  Dr. Daniel King is a missionary evangelist who has traveled to over seventy nations in his quest for souls. His goal is to lead 1,000,000 people to Jesus every year through massive Gospel Festivals, distribution of literature, and leadership training. Because of his experience and research on evangelism, he is widely regarded as one of the world’s leading experts in mass evangelism. As an evangelist, he has a deep interest in using apologetics to convince skeptics that God is real.

Recent Posts